【オークファン】ヤフオク、m zuiko OLYMPUS 12 2の最安値を徹底比較!!ヤフオク・楽天・Amazonなどオークションやショッピングサイトの比較・検討が出来る「オークファン」過去10年間のオークション落札価格・情報を網羅。 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II SLR Digital Camera Sample Photos: more photos: Press Release 2-Nov-2016 Press Release 24-Jan-2019: Marketed: 02-Nov-2016: Lens Mount: OM: Shutter Speeds: 1/32000-60 sec: Megapixels: 20.4: Random Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Samples from 40736 available Photos more. A CIPA é uma medida padrão e independente que determina quantas fotos a câmera pode tirar antes que a bateria acabe. 2. tem bateria removível. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. A bateria é removível e, se quebrar, pode ser trocada pelo usuário. 3. tem bateria recarregável. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II.OLYMPUS OM−D E−M1 Mark 2 OM-D E-M1 MARK the olympus om d e m1 mark. a landscape photographer s review of the olympus om d e m1. setting up the olympus om d e m1 my way mirrorless madness. olympus breathes new life into e m1 with big v4 0 firmware. macro focus stacking olympus image space. olympus om d e m1 mark ii Das Kameramodell Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II ist ein digitales, spiegelloses Systemkameragehäuse des herstellerübergreifenden Micro-Four-Thirds-Systems. Es ist das Nachfolgemodell vom Olympus OM-D E-M1, wurde im Herbst 2016 vorgestellt und Ende 2016 eingeführt. Das Kameragehäuse kann bis zu 18 Rohdaten-Serienaufnahmen mit automatischer 5sxFEX8. Home News News Release 2019 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II SilverLimited 2,000 Units Available Worldwide in Commemoration of the Olympus 100th Anniversary January 24, 2019 OM-D E-M1 Mark II Body Silver OM-D E-M1 Mark II Body Silver+ Digital ED 12-40mm PRO Olympus Corporation President Hiroyuki Sasa is pleased to announce a special silver edition OM-D E-M1 Mark II, scheduled to go on sale on February 22, 2019. This model will be released as a limited 2,000 units worldwide in commemoration of the Olympus 100th are sincerely grateful to all customers and other stakeholders who have supported Olympus since its founding 100 years ago. Being true to Our Purpose of “Making people’s lives healthier, safer, and more fulfilling,” we shall continue to contribute to photographic culture and deliver the joy of capturing and expressing special moments to photography lovers worldwide. News Release Details Main Features Premium silver color body Unrivaled compact and lightweight system with a dustproof, splashproof and freezeproof -10°C performance Built-in 5-axis image stabilization with a maximum of shutter speed steps of compensation performance 1 High-speed sequential shooting for capturing split-second moments, with a maximum of 18 fps sequential shooting performance in AF/AE tracking Excellent image quality achieved with the high-speed TruePic VIII image processor and Megapixel Live MOS sensor Sales Outline Category Product Name MSRP Launch Date Micro Four Thirds System standard interchangeable lens camera OM-D E-M1 Mark II SilverBody only Open price February 22,2019 1 When using M. Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm IS PRO, focal length 100mm 35mm equivalent focal length 200mm, halfway release image stabilization off, CIPA standard compliant, when correction is carried out on two axes Yaw/Pitch. Press releases are company announcements that are directed at the news posted on this site is current and accurate only at the time of their original publication date, and may now be outdated or inaccurate. Digital Camera World Verdict We’d want to do more extensive tests before reaching any final decision about the E-M1’s continuous focus tracking performance, but it’s an extraordinary camera in every other respect. The image quality belies its small sensor, and its static autofocus and burst shooting modes are exceptional. Pros +60fps at full resolution – amazing!+Great range of pro-quality lenses+Superb image stabilisation Cons -MFT sensor smaller than rivals-Complex menu and control system-Speed drops to 18fps with focus tracking Why you can trust Digital Camera World Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out how we test. Olympus has played two aces with the E-M1 II. Its 60fps burst mode is a spectacular leap forward in high-speed shooting, and even though you have to step down to 18fps to get focus tracking with moving subjects, that’s still a poke in the eye for heavier, more expensive – and slower – pro SLRs like the Canon EOS-1D X II and the Nikon D5.• Read more Olympus OM-D E-M10 III vs E-M5 III vs E-M1 IIThis camera’s other party trick is its new all-phase-detection autofocus system – designed to prove that mirrorless cameras can match SLRs for tracking moving subjects. The AF system uses 121 on-sensor phase detection AF points arranged in a rectangular array that covers a much larger area of the frame 80% of the frame width, 75% of the frame height than regular digital SLR let’s get back to that continuous shooting capability. The bald fact is the E-M1 II can shoot full-resolution, uncropped 20-megapixel images at 60 frames per second, and it can keep this up for 48 frames raw or JPEG – long enough to be much more likely of capturing a key frame than a regular if you’re not sure your reactions will be quick enough, there’s a Pro Capture mode that starts buffering frames as soon as you half-press the shutter release so that when you press it the rest of the way, you don’t just capture frames from that point on, but the preceding 14 frames this happens using the OM-D M1 Mark II’s silent shutter mode. It has to lock focus and exposure at the first frame, but it’s designed to be used where the point at which the action will occur can be framed up in advance. The new camera is splash-proof, dust-proof and cold-proof down to 10 degrees Centigrade. It comes with a quoted shutter life of 200,000 shots and an optional new HLD-9 battery grip that doubles the battery life always a sore point with mirrorless cameras and has dedicated controls for vertical shooting. Inside the body is a Live MOS sensor measuring x 13mm, with an ISO range of Low’ to 25,600. It’s equipped with a newly redesigned five-axis image stabilisation system, which can work in conjunction with a new 12-140m f/4 IS lens, launched at the same time as the E-M1 II can shoot 4K video in both the C4K 4,096 x 2,160 and 4K/UHD 3,840 x 2,160 formats – and this new lens is designed not only to offer a useful focal range for videographers 24-200mm equivalent but to offer even better hand-held footage thanks to its own in-built image stabiliser. Olympus is claiming a shutter speed advantage for this camera and lens, and its video credentials are enough to make it one of the best 4K cameras for filmmaking right and handlingThe E-M1 Mark II is the largest camera in Olympus’s OM-D range, but it’s positively diminutive next to a pro SLR. The smaller sensor size of the Olympus means it’s at a disadvantage for ultimate image quality, but it brings two big advantages size and not just about the size of the body, but the lenses too. The 12-40mm f/ Pro lens 24-80mm effective is half the size and weight of a full-frame equivalent; this goes right across the board, right up to Olympus’s 40-150mm f/ 80-300mm equivalent and 300mm f/4 super-telephoto 600mm equivalent.Despite the E-M1 II’s relatively small size, Olympus has managed to squeeze on a lot of external controls without making them feel cramped. The key dials are on the right side of the top plate, and consist of a regular mode dial and two unmarked control dials whose function depends on both the mode you’re in and the position of a lever on the back of the camera, just to the right of the viewfinder eyepiece. This effectively doubles up on the control dial functions – as long as you remember to set the lever to the correct is a camera that you can easily get confused with, at least initially. Despite the array of external controls, it also relies heavily on its menu system and an interactive touch-screen control layout, activated by the OK button in the middle of the four-way don’t have to use the touch system – you can also navigate through the options using the four-way controller buttons and the control dials on the top of the what about the revolutionary continuous shooting and autofocus modes? These are key features that surely deserved a rethink of the camera’s external layout, with dedicated controls for each. Instead, the E-M1 II follows the same generic exterior layout as its predecessor, giving no real external clue to its enhanced actual shooting experience is hard to fault, though. The electronic viewfinder is crisp and clear with little lag, even in low light, and the shutter action is unusually soft – much softer than its predecessor’s. The feel of the materials and controls is first-rate – this feels such a finely made, high-precision device that you have to remind yourself it’s also been ruggedised’ for outdoor OM-D E-M1 II’s sensor is half the size of APS-C and around one-quarter the size of a full-frame SLR sensor, yet you wouldn’t know it from the images it produces. They are extremely sharp; the roll-off in bright highlights is smooth and subtle; and lens aberrations like distortion and fringing are processed out so well that they effectively cease to exist. The OM-D II performs well at higher ISOs too, although larger-sensor rivals pull ahead OM-D E-M1 II sample imagesThe autofocus response is exceptional the OM-D E-M1 II’s high-tech phase-detection system focused on this bird of prey in an instant The high-tech autofocus system is harder to judge. We got a mixture of duds and successful shots in our early tests. What’s obvious straight away is its static AF speed. It feels at least as fast in single-shot AF mode as any pro SLR. It hunts from time to time in low light, however, or with low-contrast subjects, but the speed at which it can refocus from infinity to a subject close to the camera and back again borders on the E-M1 II is a fraction of the weight and cost of a high-speed pro sports SLR, but it has an autofocus system which narrows or perhaps even eliminates the performance gap between mirrorless and SLR technologies – and can shoot at speeds that no SLR can match. Olympus OM-D E-M1 II specificationsSensor Micro Four Thirds Live MOS sensor x 13mmFocal length conversion on lens 2xMemory 2x SD/SDHC/SDXC 1x UHS-1, 1x UHS-IIViewfinder EVF, 2,360k dotsMax video resolution 4K 4,096 x 2,160ISO range Low’-25,600Autofocus Hybrid phase/contrast detection, 121 points, all cross-typeMax burst rate 60fps AF locked, 18fps with AFScreen 3-inch vari-angle, 1,037k dotsShutter speeds 60-1/8000 sec, BulbWeight 574g, body only, with battery and memory cardDimensions 134 x 91 x 69mmPower supply BLH‑1 lithium‑Ion battery supplied, 440 shotsLab testsWe use Imatest and DxO Analyzer hardware and software to test cameras for their colour accuracy colour error signal to noise ratio the amount of noise in the images and dynamic range their ability to capture detail in very bright and dark areas. We also pick three rival cameras to test them against. Colour errorScores closer to zero are better It’s not the worst, it’s not the best. The OM-D E-M1 II’s colour rendition is more accurate than the X-T2’s, but the Sony A6300 and Panasonic GH4 are more neutral. Signal to noise ratioDecibels/ISO. Higher scores are better. Raw results use images converted to TIFF The Olympus doesn’t achieve the same performance as the X-T2 or, surprisingly, the rather good GH4. It did better than the Sony A6300 at higher ISOs, rangeExposure value/ISO. Higher scores are better. Raw results use images converted to TIFF The Panasonic GH4 and Sony A6300 are the winners here, but the Olympus is not so far behind and maintains its dynamic range right through to higher ISO settings. VerdictWe’d want to do more extensive tests before reaching any final decision about the Olympus OM-D E-M1 II’s continuous focus tracking performance, but it’s an extraordinary camera in every other respect. The image quality belies its small sensor, and its static autofocus and burst shooting modes are moreOlympus OM-D E-M10 III vs E-M5 III vs E-M1 II Best mirrorless cameras Best Olympus cameras Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited accessEnjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1 *Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription Join now for unlimited accessTry first month for just £1 / $1 / €1 Rod is an independent photography journalist and editor, and a long-standing Digital Camera World contributor, having previously worked as DCW's Group Reviews editor. Before that he has been technique editor on N-Photo, Head of Testing for the photography division and Camera Channel editor on TechRadar, as well as contributing to many other publications. He has been writing about photography technique, photo editing and digital cameras since they first appeared, and before that began his career writing about film photography. He has used and reviewed practically every interchangeable lens camera launched in the past 20 years, from entry-level DSLRs to medium format cameras, together with lenses, tripods, gimbals, light meters, camera bags and more. Rod has his own camera gear blog at but also writes about photo-editing applications and techniques at The Olympus E-M1 Mark II was eclipsed by the launch of the E-M1X, which promised even better stabilization, enhanced speed, and a handheld high-res mode but in a much larger, more expensive camera. But photographers no longer need to choose between the more advanced camera or the more portable camera, thanks to the launch of the new Olympus E-M1 Mark III. Contents At a glanceSensor & image qualityAutofocus and performanceStabilization and extra featuresVideoBody and designWhich is right for you?Bottom line As the successor, the E-M1 Mark III is easily the better camera out of the E-M1 series. The question is, is the Mark III worth the extra price now that the older Mark II is discounted? Is the Mark III worth an upgrade for photographers currently working with the Mark II? What’s the difference between the E-M1 Mark II and the E-M1 Mark III? At a glance Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Updated processor with increased buffer image stabilization Handheld high res mode Starry AF More durable shutter AF Joystick In-camera ND filters Live view through HDMI OM-Log Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II image stabilization Slightly better battery life 440 shots vs 420 Slightly lighter Cheaper Sensor & image quality 1. Shot with the Mark III 2. Shot with the Mark II Both cameras sport a 20-megapixel Micro Four Thirds sensor. That doesn’t necessarily mean image quality will be identical, however. The Mark III has a newer processor and additional options for preserving detail at high ISOs. Essentially, the Mark III can process images twice for better detail at high ISOs, though some speed is sacrificed in this mode. Still, in the real world, you’d be hard-pressed to actually pick up those small differences. The sensor may be the same, but the E-M1 Mark III gains Olympus’ latest TruePic IX processor, which is partly responsible for the new Handheld High Res mode. This feature stitches several photos together into a 50-megapixel shot, more than doubling resolution. That allows for a lot of detail from the otherwise modest sensor. The Mark II also has a high-res mode, but it requires a tripod. Autofocus and performance The E-M1 Mark II and Mark III have the same 121-point autofocus system, but the Mark III uses an improved algorithm for better performance. It also introduces an entirely new AF mode, called Starry Sky AF, that allows autofocus to be used for astrophotography, or any setting where you want to focus on pinpoints of light, such as a night cityscape. 1. E-M1 Mark III 2. E-M1 Mark II Both cameras have identical speed specifications, shooting 10 frames per second with continuous autofocus or 15 fps with focus locked when using the mechanical shutter. Switch to the electronic shutter, however, and they can reach an impressive 60 fps. However, the Mark III does come out ahead when it comes to how many photos it can shoot in a burst. At 15 frames per second, its larger image buffer takes 100 RAW photos to fill, while the Mark II makes do with a still-respectable 84. Stabilization and extra features Olympus previously said that stops was a theoretical limit of gyro-based image stabilization due to motion from the rotation of the earth. However, it broke that barrier with the E-M1 Mark III by a full stop. With the right lens, the Mark III can achieve stops of stabilization. Even with other lenses, it’s good for 7 stops — still best in class compared to any other camera brand. It’s so good, in fact, that you can shoot seconds-long exposures without a tripod. Add to this the Mark III’s built-in neutral density ND filters, and you can capture handheld long exposures even in the middle of the day. The Mark II, however, is no slouch. It’s stops of stabilization still compares favorably to the best IBIS systems from other brands. However, you don’t get the Mark III’s built-in ND filters. Video Both cameras can shoot good 4K video, and both offer a low-contrast logarithmic tone curved OM-Log for preserving more dynamic range if you don’t mind doing a little color correction in post the Mark II needs to be upgraded to firmware version 3 to unlock this feature. The Mark III’s main advantage is that it allows for an external monitor via the HDMI port, although, like OM-Log, this is a niche feature that won’t affect casual video shooters. 1. E-M1 Mark II 2. E-M1 Mark III Body and design The E-M1 Mark II and Mark III could be fraternal twins. Both have a similar look and feel, with excellent weather-sealing. They share the same electronic viewfinder EVF with a resolution something we wish had been upgraded on the Mark III, as other cameras in this price range have used higher-resolution EVFs for some time. The Mark III has two main physical differences. The first is the inclusion of an autofocus joystick, which is a much more ergonomic way to adjust the focus point. The Mark III also has Olympus’ most robust shutter to date, rated for 400,000 actuations. The Mark II is a bit lighter, but only by a few grams. If you’re looking for a more compact camera, check out the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III, which is essentially an E-M1 Mark II in a smaller body. Which is right for you? Unsurprisingly, the newer E-M1 Mark III is the better camera, with a more robust stabilization system, updated processor, handheld High Res Shot, and a few other extras. It’s ideal for travel, since you don’t necessarily need to carry a tripod or ND filters with you. However, there may not be enough reasons for Mark II owners to upgrade. Image quality will be the same, and so will burst speed and much of the user experience. The biggest reason to upgrade is the improved image stabilization for handheld long exposures and Handheld High Res mode. As the older camera, the Mark II offers a better value and currently sits about $400 cheaper. The added stabilization and extra features of the Mark III are likely worth the extra cost to some, but many photographers may be just as well putting that money toward a lens and picking up a Mark II. Bottom line Buy the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III if you need a great travel camera. Its unrivaled stabilization combined with built-in ND filters and new Starry Sky Autofocus make it an unbeatable camera for adventurers. If you don’t shoot astrophotography or long exposures, however, the Mark II will serve you just fine. Editors' Recommendations Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III vs. OM-D E-M1X High-performance flagships compared Canon EOS-1D X Mark III brings stunning stills and RAW video to an impressive DSLR Canon’s EOS-1D X Mark III wants to squash mirrorless with 20 fps, 10-bit color New teleconverter from Olympus doubles the reach of its longest lenses Olympus shooters will soon have 1,000mm lenses and wireless flash capability

olympus om de m1 mark ii